Abstract
In the essay, without going into too much detail on aspects now acquired about the important goals of doctrine and jurisprudence in the theory of the right of action as a fundamental right, we analyze some elements of persistent criticality, out of the current rhetoric. In particular, we focus on the thesis of the worthiness of the protection required, on some new declination of effectiveness, on the issue of standing. A number of conclusions are therefore drawn, also in the light of the Randstad affair.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.