Versioni
- 2023-08-31 (3)
- 2023-08-31 (2)
- 2023-04-30 (1)
Parole chiave
Come citare
Abstract
Il lavoro analizza i driver e i cambiamenti delle scelte di trasporto, prima e dopo la prima ondata del Covid-19, del personale dell’Università di Urbino. I risultati si basano su un'indagine condotta a luglio 2020 e sono stimati attraverso il mixed multinomial logit model. Il focus su Urbino deriva dal fatto che gran parte del personale che non risiede o non è domiciliata lì è situata lontano dalle principali vie di comunicazione e dalle infrastrutture di trasporto; le scelte di pendolarismo e le politiche di trasporto locali hanno impatto sul territorio. L'auto rappresenta il mezzo di trasporto prescelto a causa della distanza dalla residenza, del nucleo familiare e dello status di accademico. Le abitudini di trasporto cambiamo solamente in uno scenario post-Covid-19 “pessimista”.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Abdullah, M. & Dias, C. & Muley, D. & Shahin, M. (2020). Exploring the impacts of COVID-19 on travel behaviour and mode preferences. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 8, 100255. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100255
Allard, R. F. & Moura, F. (2018). Effect of transport transfer quality on intercity passenger mode choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 109, 89-107. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.018
Basu, R. & Ferreira, J. (2021). Sustainable mobility in auto-dominated Metro Boston: Challenges and opportunities post-COVID-19. Transport Policy. 103, 197–210. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.006
Calastri, C. & Borghesi, S. & Fagiolo, G. (2019). How do people choose their commuting mode? An evolutionary approach to travel choices. Economia Politica. 36, 887–912. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-018-0099-1
Cameron, A. C. & P. K. Trivedi. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Crotti, D. & Grechi, D. & Maggi, E. (2022). Reducing the carbon footprint in college mobility: The car commuters' perspective in an Italian case study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 92, 106702. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106702
Dai, J. & Liu, Z. & Li, R. (2021). Improving the subway attraction for the post-COVID-19 era: the role of fare-free public transport policy. Transport Policy. 103, 21–30. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.007
Danaf, M. & Abou-Zeid, M. & Kaysi, I. (2014). Modelling travel choices of students at a private, urban university: Insights and policy implications. Case Studies in Transport Policy. 2(3), 142–152. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2014.08.006
Das, S. & Boruah, A. & Banerjee, A. & Raoniar, R. & Nama, S. & Maurya, A.K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19: A radical modal shift from public to private transport mode. Transport Policy. 109, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.005
EEA Report. (2013). Air quality in Europe. No 9/2013. ISBN 978-92-9213-406-8. ISSN 1725-9177. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2800/92843
EEA Briefing. (2019). Transport: increasing oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions hamper EU progress towards environment and climate objectives. ISBN 978-92-9480-207-1. ISSN 2467-3196. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2800/375771
EEA Report. (2022). Trends and projections in Europe 2022. No 10/2022. ISBN 978-92-9480-505-8 ISSN 1977-8449. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2800/16646
Eisenmann, C. & Nobis, C. & Kolarova, V. & Lenz, B. & Winkler, C. (2021). Transport mode use during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Germany: The car became more important, public transport lost ground. Transport Policy. 103, 60–67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.012
Eluru, N. & Chakour, V. & El-Geneidy, A.M. (2012). Travel mode choice and transit route choice behaviour in Montreal: insights from McGill University members commute patterns. Public Transport. 4(2), 129-149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-012-0056-2
Focus, Transport, (2020). Growing Safety Concerns Among Public Transport Users – Survey. Express & Star News
Grechi, D. & Maggi, E. & Crotti, D. (2019), Le abitudini del pendolarismo universitario e la propensione al cambiamento. Il caso dell’Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, LXXIII(1), 5-16.
Hidalgo-González, C. & Rodríguez-Fernández, M. P. & Pérez-Neira, D. (2022). Energy consumption in university commuting: Barriers, policies and reduction scenarios in León (Spain). Transport Policy. 116, 48-57. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.10.016
ISTAT. (2021). Rapporto Annuale 2021: La situazione del Paese. ISBN 978-88-458-2054-0
Leal Filho, W. & Emblen-Perry, K. & Molthan-Hill, P. & Mifsud, M., Verhoef, L. & Azeiteiro, U.M. & Bacelar-Nicolau, P. & Olim de Sousa, L. & Castro, P. & Beynaghi, A. & Boddy, J. & Lange Salvia, A. & Frankenberger, F. & Price, E. (2019). Implementing Innovation on Environmental Sustainability at Universities Around the World. Sustainability. 11(14), 3807. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143807
Levine, J. (2006). Zoned out. Regulation, markets and choices in transportation and metropolitan land-use. ISBN 9781933115153. Routledge
Lodi C. & Marin G. & Polidori P. & Teobaldelli D. (2023). La mobilità degli studenti casa-università: scelte di trasporto durante la pandemia da Covid-19. Rivista di Economia e Politica dei Trasporti. n. 1, Sezione speciale abstract SIET, ISSN 2282-6599
Marques, C. & Bachega, S.J. & Tavares, D.M. (2019). Framework proposal for the environmental impact assessment of universities in the context of Green IT. Journal of Cleaner Production. 241, 118346. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118346
Myftiu J. & Gigliarano C. & Maggi E. & Scagni, A. (2024). University commuting during the COVID-19 pandemic: Changes in travel behaviour and mode preferences. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 53. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101091
Molloy, J. & Schatzmann, T. & Schoeman, B. & Tchervenkov, C. & Hintermann, B. & Axhausen, K.W. (2021). Observed impacts of the Covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in Switzerland based on a large GPS panel. Transport Policy. 104, 43–51. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.009
Paulley, N. & Balcombe, R. & Mackett, R. & Titheridge, H. & Preston, J., Wardman, M. & Shires, J. & White, P. (2006). The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy. 13(4). 295-306. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.004
Rérat, P. (2021). A campus on the move: Modal choices of students and staff at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 12, 100490. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100490
Rotaris, L. & Danielis, R. (2014). The impact of transportation demand management policies on commuting to college facilities: a case study at the University of Trieste, Italy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 67, 127–140. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.011
Tolentino, S. & Shtele, E. & Messori, G. & Perotto, E. (2024). Sustainable mobility policies at Universities: What after the pandemic?. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 15, 101155. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101155
Train, K.E. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation; Cambridge University Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA.
Wang, Y. & Wang, Y. & Chen, Y. & Qin, Q. (2020). Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. Journal of medical Virology. 92 (6), 568–576. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25748
Zhou, J. (2012). Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 46, 1013–1029. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.001
Zhou, J. (2014). From better understanding to proactive actions: Housing location and commuting mode choices among university students. Transport Policy. 33, 166 - 175. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.03.004
Zhou, J. & Murphy, E. & Long, Y. (2018). Commuting Efficiency Gains: Assessing Different Transport Policies with New Indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 710-721. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1510562
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Copyright (c) 2024 Chiara Lodi, Paolo Polidori