Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on cultural activity in cities, and on the contribution that urban commons can make to changing the urban cultural landscape.
Design/methodology/approach. The analysis is set within the theoretical framework of the commons, and more precisely the urban commons: therefore, we will first carry out a review of the literature covering the key aspects of the framework. Then, we will introduce a descriptive case study aimed at providing an example of the contribution that urban commons can make to the definition of cultural activities in cities.
Findings. We will find that communities managing urban commons, their values and objectives have great importance in defining the direction of cultural activities that can be carried out in such spaces; with this in mind, urban commons can make a valuable contribution to the cultural landscape of cities and neighborhood, and be part of a grassroots movement that shapes culture on the basis of social and collective needs.
Practical and Social implications. Urban commons are often highly valued by local communities, as they become social and cultural hubs in their neighborhoods. At the same time, they often face opposition from local administration, mainly based on legal issues pertaining to the ownership of the spaces. Adopting a co-production approach to public value may allow such initiatives to flourish, with support from the public sector.
Originality of the study. This paper links the fields of urban studies, with a specific focus on commons, with that of cultural activities, and takes into account a new, shared way of “making” culture in the city.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: an analyss for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623-1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00066-3
Becker, S., Naumann, M., & Moss, T. (2017). Between coproduction and commons: understanding initiatives to reclaim urban energy provision in Berlin and Hamburg. Urban Research & Practice, 10(1), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2016.1156735
Berkes, F. (2006). From community-based resource management to complex systems: the scale issue and marine commons. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01431-110145
Bianchi, I. (2018). The post-political meaning of the concept of commons: the regulation of the urban commons in Bologna. Space and Polity, 22(3), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2018.1505492.
Bianchi, I., Pera, M., Calvet-Mir, L., Villamayor, S., Ferreri, M., Reguero, N., & Maestre Andrés, S. (2024). Urban commons and the local state: co-production between enhancement and co-optation. Territory, Politics, Governance, 12(9), 1333-1352.https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2108491
Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social & Legal Studies, 17(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663908093966
Bradley, K. (2015). Open-source urbanism: Creating, multiplying and managing urban commons. Footprint, 91-107. https://doi.org/10.59490/footprint.9.1.901
Brondizio, E.S., Ostrom, E., & Young, O.R. (2009). Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 34, 253-278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707
Buchanan, J.M. (1965). An economy theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1-14.
Campanale, C., Mauro, S.G., & Sancino, A. (2021). Managing co-production and enhancing good governance principles: insights from two case studies. Journal of Management and Governance, 25, 275-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09508-y
Cellamare, C. (2019). Città fai-da-te. Tra antagonismo e cittadinanza. Storie di autorganizzazione urbana. Donzelli Editore, Roma.
Ciervo, A. (2012). I beni comuni. Rome: Ediesse.
Cortese, F. (2017). What are common goods (beni comuni)? Pictures from the Italian debate. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG, N° Especial – 2nd Conference Brazil-Italy, pp. 121-146. https://doi.org/10.12818/p.0304-2340.2017vbip121
Dallera, G. (2012). La teoria economica oltre la tragedia dei beni comuni. In M.R. Marella (ed.), Oltre il pubblico e il privato. Per un diritto dei beni comuni. Verona: Ombre Corte.
Dellenbaugh, M., Kip, M., & Bieniok, M. (2015). Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market. Birkhauser Press: Berlin, Germany.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P.C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907-1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015
Distaso, A., & Ciervo, M. (2011). Water and common goods: community management as a possible alternative to the public-private model. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 2, 143-165.
Ferguson, F. (2014). Make_Shift City: Renegotiating the Urban Commons. Jovis Verlag: Berlin, Germany.
Gibson, C.C., McKean, M.A., & Ostrom, E. (2000). People and forests: communities, institutions, and governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grazioli, M., & Caciagli, C. (2018). Resisting to the Neoliberal Urban Fabric: Housing Rights Movements and the Re-appropriation of the ‘Right to the City’ in Rome, Italy. Voluntas, 29(4), 697-711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9977-y
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (eds.) (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the new commons. Presented at “Governing shared resources: connecting local experience to global challenges”, the 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, England.
Howard, E. (1965). Garden cities of tomorrow. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Huron, A. (2015). Working with strangers in saturated space: Reclaiming and maintaining the urban commons. Antipode, 47(4), 963–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12141
Huron, A. (2017). Theorising the urban commons: new thoughts, tensions and paths forward. Urban Studies, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016685528
Levine, P. (2001). Civic renewal and the commons of cyberspace. National Civic Review, 90(3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.90301
Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. University of California Press: Berkeley, US.
Mangialardo, A., & Micelli, E. (2021) Grass-roots participation to enhance public real estate properties. Just a fad? Land Use Policy, 103, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105290
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(1–2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177
Morrow, O., & Martin, D.G. (2019). Unbundling property in Boston’s urban food commons. Urban Geography, 40(10), 1485-1505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1615819
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J.M. (1994). Rules, games and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, E. (2013). Institutional diversity of commons. In S. Levin (ed.), Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Volume I. Oxford: Elsevier.
Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1977). Public goods and public choices. In E.S. Savas (ed.), Alternatives for delivering public services: toward improved performance. Boulder: Westview.
Parker, P., & Johansson, M. (2012). Challenges and potentials in collaborative management of urban commons. In: Multi-faceted nature of collaboration in the contemporary world / [ed] Tamara Besednjak Valic, Dolores Modic, Urša Lamut, Vega Press, Ltd, 2012, p. 92-113.
Patnaik, A., Ruivenkamp, G., & Jongerden, J. (2017). Marginalized community, space of commons and autonomy: the case of the Deccan Development Society in South India. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.019
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
Petrescu, D., Petcou, C., & Baibarac, C. (2016). Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Reseach & Information, 44(7), 717-736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891.
Rochet, C. (2010). “No philosophy, please, we are managers”. Public management and the common good: Euro-Atlantic convergences. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 279-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310375539
Ruiz-Ballesteros, E., & Gual, M.A. (2012). The emergence of new commons: community and multi-level governance in the Ecuadorian coast. Human Ecology, 40(6), 847-862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9540-1
Samuelson, P.A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure, 6, 387-389.
Sardi, A., & Sorano, E. (2019). Dynamic performance management: an approach for managing the common goods. Sustainability, 11, 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226435
Seppilli, T. (2012). Sulla questione dei beni comuni: un contributo antropologico per la costruzione di una strategia politica. In M.R. Marella (ed.), Oltre il pubblico e il privato. Per un diritto dei beni comuni. Verona: Ombre Corte.
Sicilia, M., Sancino. A, Nabatchi, T., & Guarini, E. (2019). Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review. Public Money and Management, 39(4), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904
Soma, K., & Vatn, A. (2014). Representing the common goods – Stakeholders vs citizens. Land Use Policy, 41, 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.015
Tosun, J., Koos, S., & Shore, J. (2017). Co-governing common goods: interaction patterns of private and public actors. Policy and Society, 35(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.01.002
Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas, 23(4), 1083-1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
Vitale, E. (2013). Contro i beni comuni. Una critica illuminista. Rome-Bari: Laterza.
Wagner, J.R. (2012). Water and the commons imaginary. Current Anthropology, 53(5), 617-641. https://doi.org/10.1086/667622

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nathalie Colasanti, Rocco Frondizi, Carmela Gulluscio
