Abstract
The paper deals with the relationship between the judicial application of the rule laid down by art. 21-octies, par. 2, first sentence, L. 7 August 1990, No. 241 and the scope of the objective limits of ‘res judicata’. The Author defines the judicial assessment on the overall validity of the non-discretionary administrative act pursuant to the above-mentioned legislative provision as a ‘preliminary question’ covered by the res judicata. The consequences of such theoretical option are highlighted with reference to the opposite hypotheses of granting and rejecting the applicant’s claim.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.