How neutral is the choice of the allocation mechanism in cap-and-trade schemes? Evidence from the EU-ETS
PDF

Parole chiave

EU ETS
grandfathering
auctioning
carbon leakage

Come citare

De Vivo, N., & Marin, G. (2018). How neutral is the choice of the allocation mechanism in cap-and-trade schemes? Evidence from the EU-ETS. Argomenti, (9), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.14276/1971-8357.1062

Abstract

The European Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) is the central EU policy instrument aimed at mitigating climate change and to comply with the target agreed in the Kyoto protocol. The EU ETS could result in an harmful impact for the competitiveness of the European firms, as it was unilaterally introduced by the EU, and so firms could be induced to relocate their carbon-intensive production activities in countries with less stringent regulations for mitigating climate change (carbon leakage effect). For this reason, European Union decided to grant most of permits for free in its first phases and to exempt leakage-exposed sectors from auctioning in its third phase. According to Coase (1960), the level of emissions for each firm in equilibrium does not depend on the assignment of property rights over the emissions but this could not be the case in a real world system, with a lot of possible frictions, as transaction costs and behavioural anomalies.  The aim of the paper is to exploit the asymmetry in the allocation mechanisms introduced from the third phase of the EU ETS to evaluate whether different allocation mechanisms are neutral in terms of emission abatement decisions. Results suggest a non-neutral role of the allocation mechanisms, with establishments that received allowances for free having greater emissions than plants that were forced to buy allowances through auctions.
https://doi.org/10.14276/1971-8357.1062
PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici

Abrell, J., Ndoye, A., and Zachmann, G. (2011). Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data. Bruegel Working Paper 2011/08, Brussels, Belgium.

Anger, N., and Oberndorfer, U. (2008). Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. Energy Policy, 36(1): 12–22.

Borghesi S., Montini M., Barreca A. (2016), The European Emission Trading System and Its Followers. Comparative Analysis and Linking Perspectives. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science, Springer.

Borghesi S., Franco C., and Marin G. (2016) Outward Foreign Direct Investments Patterns of Italian Firms in the EU ETS, SEEDS Working Paper Series No 2016-01

Bushnell, J. B., Chong, H., and Mansur, E. T. (2011). Profiting from Regulation: An Event Study of the European Carbon Market. Dartmouth College Working Paper, Hanover, NH.

Calel R., Dechezlepr$hat{e$tre A. (2016), Enviromental policy and directed technological change: Evidence from European carbon market, Review of Eocnomics and Statistics, 98(1): 173–191.

Chan H. S., Li S., and Zhang F. (2013) Firm competitiveness and the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, Energy Policy, 63: 1056-1064

Commins, N., Lyons, S., Schiffbauer, M., and Tol, N. C. (2011). Climate Policy and Corporate Behavior. The Energy Journal, 32(4)

Coase, R.H. (1960), The problem of social cost, Journal of Social Economics 3: 1-44

Demailly, D., and Quirion, P. (2006). CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation. Climate Policy, 1, 93–113.

Demailly, D., and Quirion, P. (2008). European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy Economics, 30(4): 2009–2027.

Fowlie M. and Perhoff J.M. (2013), Distributing pollution rights in cap-and-trade programs: are outcomes independent of allocations?, Review of Eocnomics and Statistics 95: 1640-1652

Greenstone M. (2002), The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures, Journal of Political Economy 110(6): 1175-1219

Hahn, R. W. (1984), Market Power and Transferable Property Rights Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99: 753-765

Hahn, R. W., and Stavins R. N. (2011) The Effect of Allowance Allocations on Cap-and-Trade System Performance Journal of Law and Economics, 54: 267-294

Kahneman, D., Knetsch J. L., and Thaler R. H. (1990) Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6): 1325-1348.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch J. L., and Thaler R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 193-206

Levinson, A. (1996) Environmental Regulations and Manufacturers' Location Choices: Evidence from teh Census o Manufactures. Journal of Public Economics, 62: 5-29

Marin, G., Marino, M., and Pellegrin, C. (forthcoming) The impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on multiple measures of economic performance, Environmental and Resource Economics, online first

Martin R., Muuls M., de Preux L. B., Wagner U. J. (2014), Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, American Economic Review 104(8): 2482-2508.

Martin R., Muuls M., Wagner, UJ (2015) The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10 (1): 129-148.

McKinsey, and Ecofys (2006a). EU ETS REVIEW Report on International Competitiveness., Tech. rep., European Commission Directorate General for Environment, Brussels.

McKinsey, and Ecofys (2006b). Review of Emissions Trading Scheme: Survey highlights. Tech. rep., European Commission Directorate General for Environment, Brussels.

Montgomery, W. D. (1972). Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs. Journal of Economic Theory, 5: 395-418.

Murphy, J. J., and Stranlund J. K. (2007). A Laboratory Investigation of Compliance Behavior under Tradable Emissions Rights: Implications for Targeted Enforcement. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53: 196-212.

Petrick, S., and Wagner U. (2014). The Impact of Carbon Trading on Industry: Evidence from German Manufacturing Firms. Kiel Working Paper, 1912

Reguant, M., and Ellerman D. (2008). Grandfathering and the Endowment Effect:An Assessment in the Context of the Spanish National Allocation Plan. MIT CEEPR Working Paper, 08-018

Reinaud, J. (2005). Industrial competitiveness Trading Scheme. IEA Information Paper, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.

Smale, R., Hartley, M., Hepburn, C. J.,Ward, J., and Grubb, M. (2006). The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy, 6(1): 31–48.

Stavins, R. N. (1995) Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29: 133-148.

Wagner, U. J., Muuls M., Martin R., and Colmer J. (2013). The causal effect of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme: Evidence from French manufacturing plants, Unpublished.

Zaklan A. (2016), Free allocation and the endowment effect in cap-and-trade systems: evidence from the European electricity sector. EAERE Conference 2016, Zurich.

L'opera è pubblicata sotto Licenza Creative Commons - 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)