Keywords
International SME
Anti-Corruption
ICT
Transparency
How to Cite
Accepted 2020-09-09
Published 2020-09-12
Abstract
In light of the disclosed organisational corruption scandals over the last decades, firms increasingly adopt information and communication technologies (ICTs) to fight corruption. Internationally operating small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) seem particularly likely to benefit from the use of anti-corruption-related ICTs: Not only do SMEs lack knowledge on the business practices in geographically and institutionally distant markets, but they also often lack the resources and bargaining-power to reject a corrupt offer. Building on interview and documentary data, the aim of this case study is hence to explore when, how and why SMEs may experience ICTs as a chance or a challenge in the fight against corruption in foreign business. We find that trust and the lack of human interaction are central factors linking ICTs and anti-corruption at SMEs, yet involved actors currently derive at partly contradictory conclusions as to the particular role of these factors.
References
Aterido, R., Hallward-Driemeier, M., & Pagés, C. (2011). Does Expanding Health Insurance Beyond Formal-Sector Workers Encourage Informality?: Measuring the Impact of Mexico's Seguro Popular. The World Bank.
Azureh Awuni, M. (2018). Could Technology Be an Enabler of Corruption? In International Anti-Corruption Conference. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Becker, K., Hauser, C., & Kronthaler, F. (2012). Auslandskorruption bei Schweizer Unternehmen. Volkswirtschaft-Magazin für die Wirtschaftspolitik, 85(10), 63-66.
Bennedsen, M., Feldmann, S. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2009). Strong firms lobby, weak firms bribe: A survey-based analysis of the demand for influence and corruption. Weak Firms Bribe: A Survey-Based Analysis of the Demand for Influence and Corruption (November 9, 2009).
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
Branco, M. C., & Delgado, C. (2012). Business, social responsibility, and corruption. Journal of Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1426
Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies?. ALT-J, (12)2, 113-124.
Davies, T., & Fumega, S. (2014). U4 ISSUE Mixed incentives: Adopting ICT innovations for transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption. Retrieved from www.U4.no
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385
Gans-Morse, J., Borges, M., Makarin, A., Mannah-Blankson, T., Nickow, A., & Zhang, D. (2018). Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.015
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London, Profile.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16(1), 15-31.
Gordon, K. & Miyake, M. (2001). Business Approaches to Combating Bribery: A Study of Codes of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 161-173.
Hauser, C., & Kronthaler, F. (2014). Neue Märkte, neue Risiken. In Mittelständische Unternehmen, 37-60. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.
Heimann, F., & Mbiyavanga, S. (2018). Globalization and Digital Revolution. In Confronting Corruption (p. Confronting Corruption, Chapter 22). Oxford University Press.
Hlatshwayo, S., Oeking, A., Ghazanchyan, M., Corvino, D., Shukla, A., & Leigh, L. (2018). The Measurement and Macro-Relevance of Corruption: A Big Data Approach. International Monetary Fund.
Hopf, C. (2017). Qualitative Interviews: Ein Überblick. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Hrsg.), Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch (S. 349–360). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
Kalina, O., Köppl, S., Kranenpohl, U., Lang, R., Stern, J., & Straßner, A. (2003). Das Handwerk der Literaturrecherche. In Grundkurs Politikwissenschaft: Einführung ins wissenschaftliche Arbeiten (pp. 74-110). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
Mahmood, R. (2004). Can information and communication technology help reduce corruption? How so and why not: Two case studies from South Asia. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 3(3), 347-373.
Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (1989). Experteninterviews – vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion. In D. Garz & K. Kraimer (Hrsg.), Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung (S. 441–471). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Murillo, D. & Lozano, J.M. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in their Own Words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 227-240.
Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognition – psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schembera, S., & Scherer, A. G. (2017). Organizational strategies in the context of legitimacy loss: Radical versus gradual responses to disclosed corruption. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016685237
Schiffer, M., & Weder, B. (2001). Firm size and the business environment: Worldwide survey results. The World Bank.
Shim, D.C. & Eom, T.H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31, 298-316.
Smith, K. (2001). Assessing the Economic Impacts of ICT. Paper presented at the Future of Innovation Studies Conference, Eidhoven Univsersity of Technology, 21-23 September.
TI. (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index 2017. Retrieved from Transparency International https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) & United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2012). Corruption prevention to foster small- and medium-sized enterprise development: Volume II. Vienna: UNIDO & UNODC.
Weerawardena, A. O. J. (2009). Examining the role of international entrepreneurship, innovation and international market performance in SME internationalisation. European Journal of Marketing, 43(11/12), 1325–1348.
Wickert, C. (2016). “Political” Corporate Social Responsibility in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Conceptual Framework. Business & Society, 55(6), 792-824.
Yin, R. K. (1941). Case study research: design and method. Los Angeles: Sage.
Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2009). Anticorruption effects of information communication and technology (ICT) and social capital. International review of administrative sciences, 75(1), 99-116.
Copyright and licensing: The journal supports the principles contained in the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to scientific literature (2003), reiterated in the Italian CRUI Guidelines on Open Access journals. Copyright Notice: papers made open to the public are published under the CC BY--4.0 license.
Archiving : This journal uses the LOCKSS system to create an archiving system, which is distributed between participating libraries and enables them to search through the permanent archives of the journal for the purposes of conservation and restoration. All journal data and publications are also saved and stored directly on the platform