Abstract
Thomas Sheeahan criticised an article of mine on Heidegger, denying the autonomy and originality of my thought and offending me on a personal level: on the one hand, my work would be nothing more than an application (and a 'failed' one at that) of the theses of the philosophers Emmanuel Faye and Johannes Fritsche; on the other, I would be «unfortunately dependent» on the psychiatrist Massimo Fagioli. Actually, as I explain in my reply, he has been not able - or did not want - to understand the fundamental core of that article, namely my thesis on the lack of universality in the notion of world adopted by Heidegger in Being and Time. A lack which makes Heideggerian ontology «the basis, so to speak "philosophical", on which whatever kind of racism can be founded».
Heidegger; In-der-Welt-sein; Geworfenheit.
The work is published under a Creative Commons License - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0): this allows others to share the work acknowledging the intellectual authorship and the first publication in this journal.
Authors keep the rights to their work and give the journal the right of first publication.